|
{HtmlEncodeMultiline(EmailPreheader)} | DID CONSUMERS PUNISH RANA PLAZA FIRMS? EVIDENCE FROM APPAREL SALES |
|
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT This paper examines whether the 2013 Rana Plaza building collapse in Bangladesh, which killed more than 1,100 garment workers, affected consumer demand for global apparel brands. We combine brand-level sales data from Euromonitor, covering 47 countries over 2008–2018, with information on firms identified by NGOs as buyers from factories located in the collapsed building. Using a difference-in-differences design with a triple-difference across countries, we test whether these “Rana firms” experienced a decline in sales after the disaster relative to other apparel brands. We find no evidence of consumer punishment: Rana firms exhibit a marginally more positive, albeit statistically insignificant, sales trajectory compared to non-Rana companies. Only when exploiting cross-country variation in media coverage do we detect a modest decline in sales for brands more frequently cited in the domestic press. |
Click here to view the CV. |
|
|
PRESENTER Pamina Koenig University of Paris I |
RESEARCH FIELDS International Trade Firm Import and Export Behavior Economic Geography Local Spillovers Globalization Corporate Social Responsibility Ngos Reputation Maritime AIS Data Port Ownership |
DATE: 23 October 2025 (Thursday) |
VENUE: Meeting Room 5.1, Level 5 School of Economics Singapore Management University 90 Stamford Road Singapore 178903 |
|
|
|
|
| | © Copyright 2025 by Singapore Management University. All Rights Reserved. Internal recipients of SMU, please visit https://smu.sg/emailrules, on how to filter away this EDM. For all other recipients, please click here to unsubscribe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|