Please click here if you are unable to view this page.
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION
Market Power in the Global Oil Market: Weflare Analysis
We provide an empirical framework to measure the welfare impact of market power that
materializes through coordination of production (i.e. cartel) in the global crude oil market.
We leverage unique micro data on cost and production to quantity the dead weight loss and productivity inefficiency due to the OPEC cartel. We introduce a framework that recognizes the likely inter-temporal tradeoff that producers face when setting production levels. We rely on an estimated demand system for oil and we consider a range of counterfactual oil supply functions to quantity the welfare loss due to market power. The counterfactual supply curves imply counterfactual price paths that suggest a sizeable impact of market power on the global oil market. This together with the information on field-level costs allows for a model-consistent notion of lost gains from trade due to market power. We find that the welfare impact is large, implying a world-wide revenue tax (on every aspect of economic activity) of about 0.15%, or put differently about 5 trillion USD (in 2014).
Incomplete Environmental Regulation and Spatial Equilibrium in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry
How effective is local regulation when production occurs in a global market and capital is mobile? When environmental regulations differ between regions capital may relocate, resulting in spatial misallocation and ‘leakage’ of pollution and profits. In this paper I build an empirical framework to study incomplete regulation in a decentralized capital market, where capital is mobile and production occurs across multiple locations. The model extends the spatial location-choice and matching literature in industrial organization to accommodate two-sided vertical firm heterogeneity. Using novel contract and location data, I apply the framework to the global market for deepwater oil rigs. Offshore rigs are marine vessels that move around the ocean drilling wells, matching with oil companies like BP and Chevron to produce wells. Local changes in drilling standards and other regulations spur equilibrium rig relocation. The main policy finding is that incomplete regulations, such as unilateral increases in drilling standards, cause large shifts in profits and (expected) oil spilled to other markets through the capital relocation channel. In contrast, I find that more complete regulation - like a coordinated global agreement on drilling standards - would be significantly more effective than uncoordinated policies.
Technology Adoption in Upstream Oil & Gas: Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea
This paper studies innovation adoption in the North Sea upstream oil and gas industry. The focus is on the adoption of "enhanced oil recovery,'" a technology allowing eligible fields to increase production by optimizing reservoir pressure. With detailed firm- and field-level data between 1970-2010, we show that this technology increases efficiency. However, we find that adoption was not universal, as field operators face a trade-off between short-term investment costs and long-term efficiency gains. This trade-off decreases government revenues by limiting resource extraction. We examine factors that are responsible for the observed adoption rate and discuss potential policies.
KEYNOTE SPEAKER: JAN DE LOECKER
Professor of Economics
KU Leuven
Jan De Loecker is Professor of Economics at the KU Leuven, a Fellow of the Econometric Society, Research Associate at the NBER and a Research Fellow at the CEPR. He obtained his PhD in economics from KU Leuven in 2006. He was on the faculty at NYU from 2006-2008, before moving to Princeton University, where he was on the full-time faculty from 2008-2017 (tenured 2014-2017). He was a visiting faculty at Yale University and Stanford University. He specializes in the areas of industrial organization, international economics and development economics.
His research is centered around measuring, and identifying the drivers of firm performance. In particular, he has put forward empirical frameworks to estimate productivity, marginal costs and markups, using micro-level production data. These methods have been used to study the role of technology, market power, international competition, in shaping the performance of individual producers, and industries and economies at large. He has published in leading journals, such as the American Economic Review, Econometrica, Journal of Political Economy, Quarterly Journal of Economics, and various field journals.
In 2016, he was awarded with an Odysseus Research Grant from the Flemish Research Council, and in 2019 he obtained a Consolidator ERC Grant for this project MPOWER.
De Loecker has advised various corporations, institutions and international agencies (such as the World Bank, and various national and central banks) on productivity and firm performance measurement, on the impact of trade/industrial policy on growth. His work has been referenced in all major news outlets (link).
Nicholas Vreugdenhil works in empirical industrial organization and energy economics. He received a PhD from Northwestern University and is currently an assistant professor at Arizona State University. His current research uses the offshore oil and gas industry as an empirical case study to understand how booms and busts affect mismatch in capital markets. In another line of work he studies the effectiveness of proposed incomplete environmental regulation in the global offshore oil and gas industry.
Michele Fioretti is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Sciences Po, Paris. His research focuses on applied microeconometrics with a particular interest in firm strategies in energy and utility markets.