Please click here if you are unable to view this page.
TOPIC:
LOWERING THE BAR AND LIMITING THE FIELD: THE EFFECT OF STRATEGIC RISK-TAKING ON SELECTION CONTESTS
ABSTRACT
Contests for grades, promotions, and job assignments which feature lax standards or consider only limited talent pools are often criticised for being unmeritocratic. We show that low standards and exclusivity can further meritocratic selection when contestants are strategic risk takers. Strategic risk taking bounds the gains to meritocratic contest designers from expanding the contestant pool while low standards mollify risk-taking incentives and thereby increase the correlation between selection and ability. The introduction of strategic risk taking thus results in "clubby'' contest designs, featuring less inclusive contestant pools and larger expected rewards to pool members.